COLLEGE PLANNING COUNCIL (CPC)
APPROVED MINUTES
HOT TOPICS
Monday, November 6th, 2006
12:40 pm
Music Recital Hall
Members Present:
Administration: L. Spink, A. Tomlinson, A. Patterson, L. Rosas, B. McNeel, N. Malone
Faculty: Senate: M. Wood, N. Barakat
AFT: L. McKenzie, R. Oakes
Classified: I. Clark, T. Sulyok
Co-Chairs: N. Carson, S. McMurray
Students: A. Aceves, C. Collins, A. Valencia
Guests: C. Minami, K. Crummer, C. Mussa-Muldoon, T. Thompson, T. Mariner, S. Yoder, K. Campbell, B. Young, J. Smith, L. Johnston, B. Englert, B. Englert, Dr. Griffith, K. Pucher, E. Portis, W. Loiterman, Y. Pueblos, T. King, A. Escandon, B. Pisciotta, T. Munasinghe, I. Grigoriev, C. Jackson, M. Carvajal, L. Eisenberg, M. Bishop, R. Gobel
Absent: Faculty, Senate: J. Stanbery; Faculty, AFT: B. Guertin; Classified: T. Gonzalez, L. Payne, L. DeSilva; Resource: B. Easley
Meeting was called to order at 12:5. Quorum present.
1. Acceptance of Agenda (N. Carson)
Agenda accepted as proposed.
2. Acceptance of Minutes (N. Carson)
Minutes of 10/9 postponed until 11/13.
3. Construction Concerns and Issues (L. Eisenberg, L. Spink)
L. Spink and L. Eisenberg presented an overview of the construction projects, including discussing “where did the money go (question asked at previous Construction Priorities meeting,” cost increases for building (including increases in the cost of material and labor), progress at Harbor compared with other district colleges, other costs coming out of Prop A/AA funds besides actual building costs, the possibility of another bond (Prop AAA) being presented and passed in 2008.
3.1 Question and Answer: Discussion centered around the question of sharing information with the college regarding progress and costs on a regular basis, the impact of the DSA on the construction process.
4. Review of Priorities for Prop A/AA Construction (L. Spink, M. Bishop)
4.1 Review of Option 1-3: L. Spink reviewed the options 1-3 previously presented to the college, as well as the priorities rankings for each project.
|
|
Option 1 |
Option 2 |
Option 3 |
|
CDC |
new building |
existing, replace 1 portable |
existing, replace 1 portable |
|
PE |
new building |
new building |
existing building, no work |
|
LRC |
existing building, no work |
existing building, no work |
existing building, no work |
|
Chemistry/Physics |
no new building |
no new building |
new building |
|
Science |
partial renovation, 2 chem labs |
full renovation 4 chem/phys labs |
existing building, no work |
|
Business |
partial renovation, physics/fam-cons |
full renovation, geology/geography/fam-cons |
demolished |
|
Admin/Community Services |
existing building, no work |
existing building, no work |
existing building, no work |
|
Cafeteria |
existing building, no work |
existing building, no work |
existing building, no work |
|
Seahawk Center |
existing building, no work |
existing building, no work |
existing building, no work |
|
Central Yard/Material Services |
existing building, no work |
existing building, no work |
existing building, no work |
|
Campus Improvements |
reduced scope |
full scope |
full scope |
4.2 Presentation of Option 4 (L. Spink)
|
CDC |
New Building |
|
PE |
New Building |
|
LRC |
No Work (1 mil left for design) |
|
Chemistry/Physics |
New Building (Original size, 25k sq. ft, 18 mil) |
|
Science |
No Work |
|
Business & Physics |
Demolished |
|
Admin/Community Services/Job Placement |
No Work |
|
Cafeteria |
No work |
|
Seahawk Center |
No Work |
|
Central Yard |
No Work |
|
Campus Improvements |
Reduced Scope (2 mil) |
4.3 Open Discussion: M. Bishop presented an update on progress of projects, providing a handout and discussing it giving the financial statues of each project. Also discussed was the technology and central plant buildings groundbreaking to be held on 11/27, the desirability of sticking to master plan priorities, the abilities of the E7 project to digitally “map” structures and present them in 3D fly-through.
Meeting adjourned at 2:30.