MINUTES

Harbor Planning Advisory Council

Regular Meeting

November 2, 2000

 

Administration Representatives:

            Linda Spink, Nina Malone, George Ealer, Luis Rosas, Leila Menzies

Faculty Representatives:

            Jim Stanbery, Sally Fasteau

Faculty AFT Representative:

            Rod Oakes

Classified Representative:

            Sholeh Khorooshi, Amos Powell

Student Representative:

            Nick Webb

Guests:

            Josh Abarbanel, June Smith, Tissa Munasinghe, Sam Sandt

 

 

Dr. Spink passed out the latest draft of the Los Angeles Harbor College Bond Projects and asked members to help her strategize for the Chancellor’s Cabinet Meeting to be held on November 9th.  She felt she needed to have Project II prioritized by number in case she wasn’t able to get the entire package included Districtwide at the Cabinet Meeting.  After some discussion, it was decided to make the following changes in priority:

 

Move #11 to 1.

Move #1 to 2

Move #2 to 3

Move #3 to 4

Move #4 to 6

Move #5 to 9

Move #6 to 11

#7 stays the same

#8 stays the same

Move #9 to 10

Move #10 to 5

 

It was suggested that Lauren McKenzie be contacted to help do some stats and charts for the Cabinet Meeting.

 

George Ealer has a list of the buildings and their age.  He also has the maintenance dollars per campus over the last two years.  He might need to contact Ed Fajardo for further information.

 

Some justifications that could be used were:

 

Need and Fairness

We have been doing the 75-25% all along but we don’t get any money for that.

Show the money spent per student and money spent per facilities for instruction

Quality education should be offered at all of our campuses within the District, some campuses have inferior facilities

Dollars spent per new building for each campus

Stats show we are falling short

List comments in the student survey

The annual budget comparison document could be used for some of the charts

Quality treatment for all campuses

 

Rod Oakes will try to find out the electorate makeup

 

There is competition between Harbor, El Camino and Long Beach city

East competes with Pasadena and Rio Hondo

West competes with Santa Monica

City completes with Glendale

Trade – none

Southwest competes with Compton

Mission competes with Moorpark

 

Leila Menzies and Nina Malone came up with percentage to use:

 

25% even

25% buildings over 25 years

25% for FTES

25% for number of years not getting new buildings (10 years or older)

 

A meeting will be set up where Ms. Menzies, Ms. Malone, Dr. Oakes and Dr. Spink could discuss these ideas with Mr. McKenzie in order to get some stats and charts made up prior to November 9th.

 

Return to PAC Home Page