CPC Minutes

DRAFT MINUTES

COLLEGE PLANNING COUNCIL (CPC)

Monday, October 12, 2009

1:30 pm

SSA 219

 

Presiding: B. McNeel

 

Members Present:

Co-chairs: J. Smith

Administration: L. Spink, L. Rosas, A. Tomlinson, A. Patterson, N. Malone,

D. Humphreys

Faculty: AFT: B. Young, S. McMurray

Academic Senate: N. Barakat, L. McKenzie, M. Wood

Classified: I. Clarke

Students: ASO: S. Delgado, D. Gustchen, A. Alvarado, L. Gray, B. Arreola, M. Pedroza

 

Guests: AFT: R. Oakes; Arcadis: M. Bishop, B. Risley; Steinberg Architects: D. Hart, E. Andrews, J. Wirfs; S. Fasteau, B. Englert, M. Yanez, C. Mussa-Muldoon, Y. Parra, G. Swade, L. Glover, M. Hiscocks, J. Baez, L. Heimgartner, K. Campbell, D. Nagano-Krier, J. Brown

 

Absent: Administration: R. Richards; Faculty: J. Stanbery; Classified: W. Gilliam, R. Nadler, T. Limar, C. McClenney, L. DeSilva

 

Meeting was called to order at 1:45.

 

Acceptance of Agenda:

The Agenda was accepted.

 

Acceptance of Minutes:

Minutes of 7/27/09 were accepted.

 

Public Comment:

No public comment.

 

Discussion/Action Items:

Pandemic Flu Policy:

D. Humphreys passed out a handout on pandemic flu. Noticed for next meeting.

 

Reports:

 

Administrative Report:

L. Spink discussed:

•  
  •  

    • CPC needs to prioritize Measure J projects so that Steinberg can proceed with Masterplan update.

    • L. Spink prefaced Steinberg Architects presentation by discussing size and scope of bond.

    • D. Hart presented background on Prop A/AA projects and progress-to-date.

    • D. Hart presented land swap options with Parks & Recreation. CPC had previously given direction to explore options and three options were:

•  
  •  
    •  

      • Option 1 - Fields Only (swimming pool stays)

      • Option 2 - Fields & Pool (swimming pool moves)

      • Option 3 - Relocate 2 Golf Holes, Fields and Pool

• L. Spink remarked that the parking was part of the reason for the request for land across the street.

• M. Bishop presented the list of Measure J projects. Bishop remarked that no Measure J Projects have been prioritized. A Measure J project list was distributed.

Discussion items included:

•  

  • Already “Budgeted” – planned expense

  • Already “Committed” – contract has been executed or to be executed

  • “Uncommitted” – funds yet to be committed

•  

  • It was agreed that the prioritization of projects (high, medium, low) was to give direction to the architects to formulate a list of options/recommendations that would then be submitted for consideration by the CPC and subject to review by consensus.

• B. McNeel and J. Smith discussed procedures on how to reach a consensus on CPC prioritization of Measure J projects.

• B. McNeel: We will do vote on high med low. Recommend to architect to bring options to CPC for approval.

• J. Smith suggested private voting instead. Priorities should be written on a list and then turned in.

• L. Spink: Said this needs to be a final decision.

• B. McNeel recommended that only CPC members will vote.

• Others at the meeting wanted an opportunity to vote.

• N. Barakat suggested that CPC should be stopped and then started as a retreat.

• B. McNeel called for a 10 minute recess to caucus and vote as constituencies. He suggested that each constituency vote as a block.

  • The regular session of the CPC was suspended. Participants caucused outside SSA 219 and returned after discussion.

  • The group returned to SSA 219 and the retreat began. CPC was suspended. There was discussion about high priority projects from previous prioritization exercises being carried over to the updated list. It was agreed that if a project had carried a “high” priority previously and had yet to be completed that it would be listed as a “high” priority again.

  • D. Hart lead the group in discussion and prioritization of the Measure J projects. See attachment.

  • B. McNeel reconvened CPC and asked if all were in agreement with the priorities. Consensus given.

 

Meeting adjourned at 5:45pm.